- CPD Points: 0.5 [PS] [SL]
- Price: $35.00
- Area: Courts and Tribunals; Litigation
- Delivered: October 2019
Digital Content
- Recording
- PDF of Slides
To purchase login below
Description
This session is co-presented by Mr Ken Read SC and Magistrate Andrew McKee. These presenters, who are very experienced in their respective fields, discuss the effect of dispensing with the rules of evidence in tribunals; objection to expert evidence based upon a breach of the rules of natural justice; an, by way of example, work through the case of AG v Copper Mines of Tasmania. This session was delivered as part of the Litigation Convention 2019.
Kenneth Read SC, Barrister, Malthouse Chambers
About the Presenter:
Mr Ken Read SC practiced as a barrister and solicitor for the first 20 years and for the last 20+ years as a barrister. His main areas of practice are civil litigation in the Supreme Court as well as tribunal work in the Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Tribunal and the Motor Accidents Compensation Tribunal.
Magistrate Andrew McKee, Magistrate's Court of Tasmania
About the Presenter:
Magistrate Andrew McKee graduated with a BA/LLB. He was admitted 1991 and engaged in private practice and worked in government. Andrew also worked with LACT as duty Lawyer. He went on to become Principle Crown Counsel at the Office of the DPP where he practiced predominately in civil law. Andrew has been Deputy member, Deputy Chair and Chair of the Parole Board of Tasmania; a member of the Disciplinary Tribunal; and Vice President of Law Society of Tasmania. Andrew was appointed as a Magistrate in December 2014 and is currently assigned to the Coronial Division of the Court.
,
About the Presenter:
,
About the Presenter: