- CPD Points: 0.75 [PS] [EW]
- Price: $65.00
- Area: Litigation; People Skills & Management; Risk Management and Liability; Wellbeing and Lifestyle; Workplace, Business and Career
- Delivered: November 2022
Digital Content
- Recording
- No papers
To purchase login below
Description
Ms Alexis Eddy, Director, and Mr Jordan Tutton, Acting Senior Lawyer, of the Judicial Commission of Victoria joined the Litigation Conference 2022 to discuss the topic of judicial bullying. Judicial bullying occurs in Australian courts. Evidence suggests it is commonly experienced by lawyers, although it may be that only a minority of judicial officers in each jurisdiction who engage in bullying conduct. The Judicial Commission of Victoria investigates complaints about Victorian judicial officers and tribunal members and has functions relating to the professional standards applicable to those officers. This session draws on the Judicial Commission’s recent consultation on judicial bullying in Victoria, and empirical and legal research on workplace bullying. It addresses the following:
- The court as a workplace. What conduct can and should practitioners expect from judicial officers?
- What standard of conduct is generally expected by the community?
- What do we know about judicial bullying?
- How prevalent is judicial bullying, what are its impacts, what are its causes?
- What distinguishes bullying from merely ‘robust’ conduct?
- How can judicial bullying be addressed?
- How can the risks be managed proactively?
- How can instances of inappropriate conduct be effectively raised and addressed?
The key takeaways from this session are:
- Everyone attending court is entitled to be treated respectfully and with dignity. Respectful and courteous treatment contributes to (a) a more sustainable, productive sector; and (b) greater perceptions of fairness by court users.
- Judicial bullying is not consistent with the standards of conduct generally expected of judicial officers. It is conduct that can present a significant risk to the wellbeing, health and safety of practitioners, court users, court staff and other judges.
- The risk of judicial bullying occurring can be managed through:
- identifying and controlling, insofar as possible, the drivers of bullying;
- strong commitment from heads of jurisdiction and court leadership;
- setting clear standards of judicial conduct; and
- implementing processes for reporting and responding to instances of bullying.
- Addressing instances of judicial bullying requires:
- raising awareness of the occurrence and impacts of judicial bullying;
- accessible forms of education, mentoring and counselling to pro-actively support judicial officers;
- action by the legal profession and judiciary, especially at senior levels, to raise inappropriate judicial conduct and support others to do so; and
- clear, fair and transparent mechanisms for investigating complaints (that do not impinge upon judicial independence).
- CPD Points: 0.75 [PS] [EW]
- Price: $65.00
- Area: Litigation; People Skills & Management; Risk Management and Liability; Wellbeing and Lifestyle; Workplace, Business and Career
- Delivered: November 2022
Digital Content
- Recording
- No papers
To purchase login below
Description
Ms Alexis Eddy, Director, and Mr Jordan Tutton, Acting Senior Lawyer, of the Judicial Commission of Victoria joined the Litigation Conference 2022 to discuss the topic of judicial bullying. Judicial bullying occurs in Australian courts. Evidence suggests it is commonly experienced by lawyers, although it may be that only a minority of judicial officers in each jurisdiction who engage in bullying conduct. The Judicial Commission of Victoria investigates complaints about Victorian judicial officers and tribunal members and has functions relating to the professional standards applicable to those officers. This session draws on the Judicial Commission’s recent consultation on judicial bullying in Victoria, and empirical and legal research on workplace bullying. It addresses the following:
- The court as a workplace. What conduct can and should practitioners expect from judicial officers?
- What standard of conduct is generally expected by the community?
- What do we know about judicial bullying?
- How prevalent is judicial bullying, what are its impacts, what are its causes?
- What distinguishes bullying from merely ‘robust’ conduct?
- How can judicial bullying be addressed?
- How can the risks be managed proactively?
- How can instances of inappropriate conduct be effectively raised and addressed?
The key takeaways from this session are:
- Everyone attending court is entitled to be treated respectfully and with dignity. Respectful and courteous treatment contributes to (a) a more sustainable, productive sector; and (b) greater perceptions of fairness by court users.
- Judicial bullying is not consistent with the standards of conduct generally expected of judicial officers. It is conduct that can present a significant risk to the wellbeing, health and safety of practitioners, court users, court staff and other judges.
- The risk of judicial bullying occurring can be managed through:
- identifying and controlling, insofar as possible, the drivers of bullying;
- strong commitment from heads of jurisdiction and court leadership;
- setting clear standards of judicial conduct; and
- implementing processes for reporting and responding to instances of bullying.
- Addressing instances of judicial bullying requires:
- raising awareness of the occurrence and impacts of judicial bullying;
- accessible forms of education, mentoring and counselling to pro-actively support judicial officers;
- action by the legal profession and judiciary, especially at senior levels, to raise inappropriate judicial conduct and support others to do so; and
- clear, fair and transparent mechanisms for investigating complaints (that do not impinge upon judicial independence).
Alexis Eddy, Director, Judicial Commission of Victoria
About the Presenter:
Ms Alexis Eddy was appointed Director of the Judicial Commission of Victoria in October 2019. Before commencing her role at the Commission, she was head of legal and compliance at the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission. Prior to that Alexis was with the Office of Police Integrity, the Department of Justice in criminal law policy, worked as a prosecuting solicitor at the Office of Public Prosecutions and as an industrial relations and equal opportunity lawyer at a major law firm. Alexis has also worked as a volunteer migration agent and not-for-profit board member. Alexis has an expert understanding of the Victorian integrity regime, best practice policies and procedures and comes with a depth of knowledge and expertise across the justice system. Alexis is passionate about wellbeing in the workplace and leading an organisation where this is prioritised, both in the Commission’s day to day culture and in its strategic goals.
Jordan Tutton, Acting Senior Lawyer, Judicial Commission of Victoria
About the Presenter:
Mr Jordan Tutton is Acting Senior Lawyer at the Judicial Commission of Victoria. Before joining the Commission, he was an associate to a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia, and a solicitor at the Crown Solicitor’s Office (SA). Jordan also is an Adjunct Research Associate at Flinders University, and has published academic work on judges, courts and civil litigation.
,
About the Presenter:
,
About the Presenter: